In a December 2011 meeting to review and get comments on the proposed closing of the Binghamton Regional Processing Center, many local residents spoke out against the plan. No one spoke for it.
The closing of neighborhood post offices has proven to be an attack on the poor, disabled, and those elderly using a PO Box, as well as others who depend on the Postal Services and do not have access to any others. The threatened closing of area processing centers will mean three day instead of overnight delivery causing additional hardships and the loss of 35,000 jobs nationally. Seventy-five jobs would be lost in the Binghamton area. Carolyn Laskowski attended the meeting to protest the layoff of people. “I am here to fight so that people don’t lose their jobs”. Read the rest of this entry »
The American citizens have lost their homes through corrupt lending practices by big banks and lending institutions such as Wells Fargo and Country Wide. They have had their jobs move overseas by big corporations such as IBM and General Electric. They have been killed and have had their land polluted and destroyed by big oil and mining corporations such as British Petroleum and Massey Energy. In 2009 the U.S. taxpayers bailed out the “Too Big to Fail” banks to the sum of $800 billion. The Federal Reserve also lent trillions of dollars to cover their sour investments. All of this thievery and corruption is happening because the U.S. Supreme Court has given corporations year by year more rights under the U.S. Constitution. It began in earnest in 1886 when corporations were granted person-hood status equating them legally to U.S. Citizens turning our Bill of Rights upside down.
The final blow to the corruption of the Constitution occurred when the Supreme Court gave corporations the right to spend unlimited amounts of money in elections. Read the rest of this entry »
Almost daily the Press & Sun Bulletin prints a front page story concerning the pay, pensions and health care benefits of public employees. The underlying concern is that the public employees are the reason for the financial problems that beset our community, state and nation. There are a number of problems with this approach by the Press. Read the rest of this entry »
The relation of information technology (IT) and more specifically the internet, to politics is a central issue facing contemporary social movements. Like many previous scientific advances the IT innovations have a dual purpose: on the one hand, it has accelerated the global flow of capital, especially financial capital and facilitated imperialist ‘globalization’. On the other hand the internet has served to provide alternative critical sources of analysis as well as easy communication to mobilize popular movements.
The IT industry has created a new class of billionaires, from Silicon Valley in California to Bangalore , India . They have played a central role in the expansion of economic colonialism via their monopoly control in diverse spheres of information flows and entertainment.
To paraphrase Marx “the internet has become the opium of the people”. Young and old, employed and unemployed alike spend hours passively gazing at spectacles, pornography, video games, online consumerism and even “news” in isolation from other citizens, fellow workers and employees.
In many cases the “overflow” of “news” on the internet has saturated the internet, absorbing time and energy and diverting the ‘watchers’ from reflection and action. Just as too little and biased news by the mass media distorts popular consciousness, too many internet messages can immobilize citizen action.
The internet, deliberately or not, has “privatized” political life. Many otherwise potential activists have come to believe that circulating manifestos to other individuals is a political act, forgetting that only public action, including confrontations with their adversaries in public spaces, in city centers and in the countryside, is the basis of political transformations.
IT and Financial Capital
Let us remember that the original impetus for the growth of “IT” came from the demands of big financial institutions, investment banks and speculative traders who sought to move billions of dollars and euros with the touch of a finger from one country to another, from one enterprise to another, from one commodity to another.
The global financial crash of 2008-2009 and its continuation today, was induced by the computerized packaging of financial swindles and underfunded real estate mortgages.
The Democratization of the Internet
The internet became accessible to the masses as a market for commercial enterprise and then spread to other social and political uses. Most importantly it became a means of informing the larger public of the exploitation and pillage of countries and people by multi-national banks. The internet exposed the lies which accompany US and EU imperialist wars in the Middle East and Sothern Asia.
The internet has become contested terrain, a new form of class struggle, engaging national liberation and pro-democracy movements. The major movements and leaders rely on the internet to inform the world of their struggles, programs, state repression and popular victories. The internet links peoples’ struggles across national boundaries – it is a key weapon in creating a new internationalism to counter capitalist globalization and imperial wars.
The Internet and Class Politics
We should remember that computerized information techniques are not ‘neutral’ – their political impact depends on their users and overseers who determine who and what class interests they will serve. More generally the internet must be contextualized in terms of its insertion in public space.
Internet has served to mobilize thousands of workers in China and peasants in India against corporate exploiters and real estate developers. But computerized aerial warfare has become the NATO weapon of choice to bomb and destroy independent Libya. In other words IT technology has dual uses: for popular liberation or imperial counter revolution.
Neoliberalism and Public Space
The discussion of “public space” has frequently assumed that “public” means greater state intervention on behalf of the welfare of the majority; greater regulation of capitalism and increased protection of the environment. In other words benign “public” actors are counter posed to exploitative private market forces.
But today, the “public sphere”, specifically the state is much more intrusive in civil society as a repressive force, particularly as neo-liberal policies increase inequalities. Because of the intensification and deepening of the financial crises, the public sphere (the state) has undertaken a massive role in bailing out bankrupt banks.
Because of large scale fiscal deficits provoked by capitalist class tax evasion, colonial war spending and public subsidies to big business, the public sphere (state) imposes class based “austerity” program cutting social expenditures and prejudicing public employees, pensioners, and private wage and salaried employees.
The basic issue underlying any discussion of the public sphere and the social opposition is not its decline or growth but rather the class interests which define the role of the public sphere. Under neo-liberalism, the public sphere is directed by the use of public treasury to finance bank bailouts, militarism and expanded police state intervention. A public sphere directed by the “social opposition” (workers, farmers, professionals, employees) would enlarge the scope of public sphere activity with regard to health, education, pensions, environment and employment.
The Internet and the Social Opposition: The Threat of State
For the social opposition the internet is first and foremost a vital source of alternative critical information to educate and mobilize the “public” – especially among progressive opinion- leaders, professionals, trade unionists and peasant leaders, militants and activists. The internet is the alternative to the capitalist mass media and its propaganda, a source of news and information that relays manifestos and informs activists of sites for public action. Because of the internet’s progressive role as an instrument of the social opposition it is subject to surveillance by the repressive police-state apparatus. For example, in the USA over 800,000 functionaries are employed by the “Homeland Security” police agency to spy on billions of emails, faxes, and telephone calls of millions of US citizens. How effective the policing of tons of information each day is another question. But the fact is that the internet is not a “free and secure source of information, debate and discussion.” In fact, as the internet becomes more effective in mobilizing the social movements in opposition to the imperial and colonial state, the greater is the likelihood of police-state intervention under the pretext “combating terrorism”.
The Internet and Contemporary Struggle: Is it Revolutionary?
It is important to recognize the importance of the internet in detonating certain social movements as well as relativizing its overall significance.
The internet has played a vital role in publicizing and mobilizing “spontaneous protests” like the ‘indignados’ (the indignant protestors) mostly unaffiliated unemployed youth in Spain and the protestors involved in the US “Occupy Wall Street”. In other instances, for example, the mass general strikes in Italy, Portugal , Greece and elsewhere the organized trade union confederations played a central role and the internet had a secondary impact.
In highly repressive countries like Egypt , Tunisia and China , the internet played a major role in publicizing public action and organizing mass protests. However, the internet has not led to any successful revolutions – it can inform, provide a forum for debate, and mobilize, but it cannot provide leadership and organization to sustain political action let alone a strategy for taking state power. The illusion that some internet gurus foster, that ‘computerized’ action replaces the need for a disciplined, political party, has been demonstrated to be false: the internet can facilitate movement but only an organized social opposition can provide the tactical and strategic direction which can sustain the movement against state repression and toward successful struggles. The internet is a means not an end in itself. The internet is part of a public sphere whose purpose and results are determined by the larger class structure in which it is embedded.
“Desktop Militants” and Public Intellectuals
The social opposition is defined by public action: the presence of collectivities in political meetings, individuals speaking at public meetings, activists marching in public squares, militant trade unionists confronting employers, poor people demanding sites for housing and public services from public authorities…
To address an active assembled public meeting, to formulate ideas, programs and propose programs and strategies through political action defines the role of the public intellectual. To sit at a desk in an office, in splendid isolation, sending out five manifestos per minute defines a “desktop militant”. It is a form pseudo-militancy that isolates the word from the deed. Desktop “militancy” is an act of verbal inaction, of inconsequential “activism”, a make-believe revolution of the mind. The exchange of internet communications becomes a political act when it engages in public social movements that challenge power. By necessity that involves risks for the public intellectual: of police assaults in public spaces and economic reprisals in the private sphere. The desktop “activists” risk nothing and accomplish little. The public intellectual links the private discontents of individuals to the social activism of the collectivity. The academic critic comes to a site of action, speaks and returns to his/her academic office. The public intellectual speaks and sustains a long-term political educational commitment with the social opposition in the public sphere via the internet and in face to face daily encounters.
Information gathered by Ravenna Narizanno-Bronson
Who is occupying Binghamton and why? What could possibly bring people to choose to sleep in tents outside in the freezing cold in protest? Do they have personal connections to the issues? What do occupiers do exactly? What are the best and worst parts? Do they think the media is reporting fairly? What do they want us to know? We asked and here are some answers…
“I’d rather be here than in an apartment. I work for minimum wage and it is so low. If minimum wage was consistent with inflation it would be $13 plus an hour. America was built on democracy but turned into a society that the more money you have the more representation. Last year the CEO of Exxon Mobile oil made over 27 million after taxes I made 12 thousand, maybe. Here at the occupation I help with security. We are a tight community that has become like family. Locally the media has been decent. Large scale news, especially fox is bashing us – calling us unemployed etc.. Washington Post did a study – over 80% of occupiers have jobs.” – Matt A. – Full-time occupier sleeping outside in a tent since day 4. Read the rest of this entry »
By Ravenna Narizanno-Bronson
On December 31, 2011 President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which includes indefinite detention of human beings without trial. Not only is this unconstitutional and illegal but it is inhumane. NDAA is a violation of both civil and human rights and sets the stage for further crimes against humanity — and President Obama knows this.
Is the government setting itself up to repeat our country’s negative history? Has it forgotten the Salem Witch Trials and McCarthyism? Or, is our government so desperate to silence its critics that it is intentionally stripping its citizens and all people of their right to have a voice? Read the rest of this entry »
By C. Arthur Reavis
The Department of Defense (DoD) is planning on privatizing the existing retirement system for current and future recruits. This plan is the brainchild of the Defense Business Board (DBB) and its chair, Richard V Spencer. Spencer is the former President of Crossroads Investment Management LLC, a venture capital and private equity firm. The whole DBB is comprised of big shots in the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). The DBB is spinning this new plan as being “fair[er]” than the existing retirement system. Currently a soldier vests after 20 years of service to get 50% pay. The new plan is modeled after private sector 401k plans, it would vest a soldier sooner. The new plan would also provide for slightly higher contributions from the DoD for hazardous/hardship tours. But the new plan would allow the military to limit contribution to rates similar to that of private sector 401k’s (about 4-12% annually) and supposedly help control recruitment levels.
It would also enrich a few bankers and corporate elite while financially straining our troops and their morale.
Read the rest of this entry »